From the Dark Corner: An “Authenticated” NOT 1787 Connecticut Copper

Connecticut coppers, minted between 1785 and 1788, are among the most fascinating coins of early American numismatics. Their variety of designs and often crude minting methods make them both challenging and rewarding for collectors. However, the very traits that intrigue collectors also make Connecticut coppers ripe for counterfeiting and misidentification. Among the many mysteries of these colonial-era coins is the occasional appearance of a piece that, though authenticated, doesn’t seem quite right. A recent discovery of a purported 1787 Connecticut copper sheds light on the challenges of authentication and the need for a careful, experienced eye.

The Connecticut Copper: A Colonial Icon

The Connecticut copper series was authorized by the State of Connecticut in 1785 to provide small-denomination coinage for local commerce. Produced by private contractors, these coins were struck in a wide array of designs, featuring variations in legends, busts, and reverse motifs. The 1787 issue, in particular, is notable for its diversity, with dozens of die varieties cataloged.

Given their historical importance, Connecticut coppers are highly sought after by collectors. Unfortunately, their rudimentary production methods—along with centuries of wear—make them difficult to authenticate. Enter the tale of the “authenticated” but not-so-authentic 1787 copper.

An “Authenticated” Discovery

The coin in question initially appeared promising. Certified as a genuine 1787 Connecticut copper by a third-party grading service, it boasted reasonable wear and a design consistent with known die varieties. For collectors, having a coin authenticated by a respected grading service offers a sense of security. However, this coin’s story demonstrates that even experts can be fooled.

Upon closer examination by an experienced numismatist, discrepancies began to emerge. While the coin’s design closely matched known varieties, subtle anomalies raised red flags:

1. Planchet Characteristics: The coin’s weight and thickness were slightly off, suggesting it might have been struck on a modern reproduction planchet rather than an original copper blank.
2. Die Features: The dies used to strike the coin appeared similar to genuine dies but featured minor differences in letter spacing and details on the obverse bust.
3. Patina and Wear: The coin’s surface showed an artificial patina, likely created to mimic the natural aging process of copper over 200+ years.

How Did It Pass Authentication?

The grading service may have overlooked these discrepancies due to the sheer variety of legitimate 1787 Connecticut copper dies. Additionally, the coin’s skillful imitation of genuine wear and patina could have masked the telltale signs of forgery.

Lessons for Collectors

The case of the “authenticated” NOT 1787 Connecticut copper underscores the importance of vigilance in numismatics. Here are some key takeaways for collectors:

• Know Your Varieties: Familiarize yourself with the specific die varieties of coins you collect. Even subtle deviations can signal a counterfeit.
• Examine Planchets: Compare the weight, thickness, and composition of your coin to known genuine examples.
• Trust, But Verify: While grading services provide valuable expertise, no system is foolproof. Seeking second opinions from specialists is always a good practice.

Conclusion

This misattributed Connecticut copper serves as a reminder of the complexities and challenges of numismatics. While the coin may not be a genuine 1787 issue, its story highlights the importance of due diligence and continuous learning in the field. For collectors, every discovery—authentic or not—offers an opportunity to deepen one’s knowledge and appreciation of the rich history of American coinage.

Granny’s Garden School

FAQs